The Fear of Knowing: Kendrick Lamar and Art's Intellectual Crisis
What if the rejection of Kendrick Lamar's artistry isn't about the music at all but about a culture that fears what it cannot intellectually dominate?
Kendrick Lamar at the Apple Music Super Bowl LIX Halftime Show. Image property of Cindy Ord and Getty Images.
As consumers who value instant gratification and surface-level consumption, true artistry is often met with confusion and even hostility. As audiences grow increasingly detached from critical thought, we have entered a climate where art that dares to provoke and confront uncomfortable truths is dismissed as 'too deep' or inaccessible.
This phenomenon, famously termed anti-intellectualism, has become deeply embedded in the way we engage with creative expression today. Richard Hofstadter introduced the term "anti-intellectualism" in his 1963 book, Anti-Intellectualism in American Life.
He defined it as a widespread resistance to critical thinking and scholarly activities. The Oxford English Dictionary echoes this same sentiment, describing anti-intellectualism as outright opposition or hostility towards intellectual engagement.
This phenomenon is evident in the way society reacts to art, politics and media. From dismissing complex films and literature as 'pretentious' to ridiculing political discourse that demands nuance and historical context, anti-intellectualism persists.
This rejection of intellectual exploration not only limits personal growth but also stifles innovation in creative industries. When people refuse to engage with ideas that challenge their worldview—they create an environment where ignorance becomes normality and progress is hindered.
The refusal to engage with the intellectual depth of Black music reveals itself most clearly in how Black artists are denied the same critical recognition as their white counterparts. Our genres are often stripped of their literary and political weight and reduced to entertainment. At the same time, the complex storytelling and cultural critique in the work of artists like Lamar are dismissed as too 'radical'.
This rejection often comes from an audience unwilling to confront the discomfort of racial history and systemic oppression. Yet, Bob Dylan's political songwriting and Radiohead's existential angst are praised as profound. The discomfort with Black intellectualism in music reflects not only the audience's resistance to being challenged but also the white-dominated critical spaces that tend to gatekeep what is considered 'intelligent' art.
Like it or not, we inhabit a world steeped in anti-intellectualism. Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl halftime show ignited a cultural firestorm a few months ago, exposing deep-seated biases. Critics' reactions vary from confusion, saying "I didn't get it," to discomfort, stating "It was too Black for me." This uproar confirms that Lamar's performance achieved its intended purpose: to challenge and resonate.
Anti-intellectualism in art consumption arises when audiences reject engagement with complexity, opting for passive entertainment over critical thinking. Rather than embracing symbolism and cultural commentary, many dismiss intellectually demanding displays as too complicated, pretentious, or not to their liking.
This resistance then weakens artistic discourse online, reducing art to a fleeting spectacle rather than a force for reflection and thought. When people refuse to engage with challenging ideas, they not only diminish their own understanding but also contribute to a broader culture that undervalues artistic depth and the power of creative expression.
It should come as no surprise that Lamar's Super Bowl performance left many feeling confused or uncomfortable. This artist has built his entire career on subverting expectations and embedding layers of meaning within his work. Lamar is a master of semiotics, utilising symbolism, imagery, and cultural references to convey broader social messages.
His 2016 Grammy performance saw him take the stage in chains and prison attire, surrounded by dancers representing incarcerated Black men, before transitioning into a performance of "The Blacker the Berry" and "Alright", two tracks that directly confront systemic racism and police brutality in America.
Through this performance, Lamar not only drew attention to the prison industrial complex but also reclaimed Black identity and resilience in the face of oppression and adversity. This level of artistic depth requires audiences to actively engage, analyse, and reflect, something that many are unwilling to do.
Much like his Super Bowl set, which was filled with subtle nods to Black revolutionary history and references to his own artistic journey, Lamar's work demands more than passive consumption; it requires curiosity and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths.
Nothing in Lamar's musical arsenal suggests he would dilute his discography to cater to those unwilling to grasp its depth. Historically, the Super Bowl halftime show is typically a spectacle of over-the-top entertainment—explosions, laser displays, and a medley of hit songs.
“But Kendrick Lamar doesn’t do ‘big, dumb fun’. Lamar thrives on nuance and a brand of entertainment laced with tension and urgency. In the face of high stakes and charged emotions, he delivered a performance that was as intense as it was compelling: proving that substance can be just as electrifying as the spectacle.”
People are drawing meaning from the performance based on their own expertise, experiences, and cultural knowledge, weaving together deeper narratives about race, identity, and resistance. The fact that reactions to the performance are so varied—from admiration to discomfort—challenges the idea that we all seek the same things from education or cultural expression.
Lamar's artistry serves as a clarion call to action for those who feel the urgent need to confront systemic injustice and reclaim cultural power. It emphasises the emotional and intellectual divide between those eager to engage with these ideas and those who resist them. This distinction makes it evident that education is neither a neutral nor a unified pursuit.
All of the deliberately obtuse takes on the performance reflect not only the deep-seated anti-intellectualism that plagues modern culture but also the insidious racial discomfort that continues to define Global discourse. The inability, or outright refusal, to engage with Lamar's artistry, symbolism, and cultural commentary speaks volumes about a society that rejects what it cannot immediately understand.
Dismissing his performance is not a critique of the art itself but rather a symptom of a society that fears complexity, nuance, and Black expression that refuses to cater to white comfort. In this sense, the backlash serves as a perfect embodiment of America's long-standing tradition of ignorance and racial resentment, where prejudice is dressed up as criticism and intellectual laziness disguises itself as objectivity.
Stream GNX below:
